A federal judge declared that the NYPD’s “stop and frisk” policy violates the citizen’s 4th Amendment rights.
Judge Shira A. Sheindlin said she would appoint an independent lawyer to monitor the NYPD and ensure it didn’t continue the policy, or otherwise behave unconstitutionally. The New York Times believes that additional judicial oversight will shape the policing tactics of the next mayor.
While the Supreme Court has long held that police have the authority to stop people who are acting suspiciously, Sheindlin ruled that police didn’t have reasonable suspicion in most stop-and-frisk incidents. As evidence, she cited the fact that 88% of stop-and-frisk targets were released without so much as a ticket being issued.
Like Magic 106.3 on Facebook to stay updated with the latest entertainment news and original interviews!
· Recent Posts
- Are Black Women Choosing the Wrong Men to Date? Sophia Nelson Lets Us Know
- HUGGY LOWDOWN Needs a New Bootleg Man!!!
- SERIOUSLY? Woman Lies About Father’s Death To Avoid Ticket
- Who Knew Mellody Hobson was Having a Baby?! TOP OF THE MORNIN’
It’s Unconstitutional! Judge Shuts Down Stop-and-Frisk was originally published on wzakcleveland.com